Move beyond summarizing the abstract. This structure helps a group examine the design, challenge the interpretation, and say exactly what the paper may—or may not—change in practice.
Free to start. No card, no install, nothing to download.
Hear it first
This independent show demonstrates a journal-club discussion; Hilite is not affiliated with or endorsed by it.
42:00A current episode included as an independent example of clinicians appraising and discussing published evidence.
Listen on Apple Podcasts ↗How it works
Record a panel, edit the transcript, balance remote speakers, create accessible notes, and publish a careful discussion of the evidence.
Record moderators, trainees, clinicians, researchers, or professional peers from any browser.
Made for clinical and professional learning groups
A shared structure keeps the discussion rigorous, listenable, and useful after the meeting.
The five sections move from the practice question to appraisal, debate, and explicit implications.
Start with a head start
The discussion, section by section
A journal-club discussion structure for the clinical or professional question, study design, critical appraisal, competing interpretations, and implications for practice.
FAQ
Follow the professional, clinical, privacy, and disclosure requirements that apply to your group.
Choose one paper and one practice question, assign a moderator, record the five sections, verify the transcript, and publish with full citations and disclosures.
Turn critical appraisal into an accurate, accessible episode.
Keep exploring
